> Where is Piper going next? Who knows? Actually, we do have a pretty clear > idea, but we want to keep our options open. I think there're are three objectives attracted to form what Piper will be: 1. The needs to have a tool that links application to each other 2. A network of nodes that are executed in a powerfull environment 3. A platform that offers a better way of building a system on top Think everybody can link these points to specific Piper participants :) > > What should we be coding next? Actually, I should be used to these questions > from Brad. He told me very early on that he's a code monkey and not a > coordinator. What we should code on next is whatever anyone thinks will help > us reach the most recently drafted design goals. I can't dictate the coding > any closer than that, and I probably shouldn't. We've had some heated > arguments at the times I told Brad what should be done with his code. Plus, I > don't have the depth of knowledge that Jean-Marc and Jarl have regarding how > their particular code bases can be developed. We still need to finish the 1st phase of creating Piper: getting a pilot to actually run :) bye, jarl