[Pipet Devel] kapi (was: Piper HOWTO)

[J.W. Bizzaro]

"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote:
> 
> Otherwise, we'll probably have to distribute the library separately.  That's
> the only legal alternative.

Wouldn't there be a need for a "Linux Kapi", which is what you're working on?

Question: If kapi/KQML is a standard, why is kapi so old and undeveloped?

Jeff
-- 
J.W. Bizzaro                                           jeff at bioinformatics.org
Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab     http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff
"All those scientists--they're all alike!  They say they're working for us,
but what they really want is to rule the world!" 
  -- Angry Villager, Young Frankenstein
--