Jarl van Katwijk wrote: > > The UI and DL need to be enhanced to accept messages from the BL\PL > backend, rather that just commit an execution network and exspect only > the end results. Maybe we could extend the bl->dl->ui communication, the > code that routes the results after a network has executed. We were also planning on a channel for "process status", right? For example, the user would need to know (1) if the process started or not, (2) if it is still running correctly, (3) how long it has been running, (4) if it encountered an error, and (5) if it finished without an error. Could you tell me if your idea for a virtual terminal is the same or not? Cheers. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "All those scientists--they're all alike! They say they're working for us, but what they really want is to rule the world!" -- Angry Villager, Young Frankenstein --