Jarl van Katwijk wrote: > > Are you asking us or is this a part of the quote? Asking > Anyways, I think .net > will be crushed unther it's own weight: it's mad to think Mircrosoft or > any other firm could build it. A 'general VM that abstracts any hardware > ' is something out a satiric movie about an insane scientist. Will die > same death as Java: burried in it's little nich where it has some sort > of usefullness. And forgotten once it's no longer a buzz word. That is, *IF* it is only supported by Microsoft. Having Gnome support .NET (and/or the Free/Open source community in general, as the article suggests) throws some substantial weight behind ".NET as an open standard". It would be the irony of the decade if the Free/Open source community actually ends up boosting a Microsoft system into dominance. I'm extremely biased, but I would rather see a UNIX-like system that leverages existing tools and uses community-developed standards. Hmmm, now what could that be? ;-) Cheers. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously." -- Benjamin Franklin --