• [Photo] J.W. Bizzaro December 27, 2006
    Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel Prize laureate and Columbia University professor, wrote this editorial (with a Christmas theme) in opposition to patents in medicine:

    ``At Christmas, we traditionally retell Dickens's story of Scrooge, who cared more for money than for his fellow human beings. What would we think of a Scrooge who could cure diseases that blighted thousands of people's lives but did not do so? Clearly, we would be horrified. But this has increasingly been happening in the name of economics, under the innocent sounding guise of `intellectual property rights.'

    ``Intellectual property differs from other property —- restricting its use is inefficient as it costs nothing for another person to use it. Thomas Jefferson, America's third president, put it more poetically than modern economists (who refer to `zero marginal costs' and `non-rivalrous consumption') when he said that knowledge is like a candle, when one candle lights another it does not diminish from the light of the first. Using knowledge to help someone does not prevent that knowledge from helping others. Intellectual property rights, however, enable one person or company to have exclusive control of the use of a particular piece of knowledge, thereby creating monopoly power. Monopolies distort the economy. Restricting the use of medical knowledge not only affects economic efficiency, but also life itself.''

    Full editorial:
    http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7582/1279

    Via Slashdot.

Discussion forums: BMJ: Scrooge and intellectual property rights

Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

Start a new thread:

You have to be logged in to post a reply.

© 1998-2025 Scilico, LLC. All rights reserved.