Bioinformatics.org
[University of Birmingham]
[Patsnap]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (44435+) Group hosting [?] Wiki
    Franklin Award
    Sponsorships

    Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • News & Commentary - Message forums

    News.com: Supercomputer ranking method faces revision
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Monday, June 21, 2004 (1 comment)

    Submitter

    An article by Stephen Shankland:

    ``An effort by PC makers to move beyond a single, simple speed measurement for showing computing performance is now being matched by a similar push in the world of supercomputers--and not everyone is applauding the change.

    ``An organizer of the Top500 supercomputer rankings has produced a broader test suite that measures multiple dimensions of a machine's performance. By comparison, a mathematical test called Linpack is currently used to rank systems on the Top500 list, which is released twice a year with much fanfare.

    ```For a long time it's been clear to all of us (that) we needed to have more than just Linpack,' said Jack Dongarra, a University of Tennessee professor who helped create Linpack and who's now working on a suite of tests that go beyond pure number-crunching prowess. `No single number can reflect the overall performance of a machine.'''

    Full story:
    http://news.com.com/2100-7337-5238405.html

    On a related note, Bioinformatics.Org hosts the ``Bioinformatics Benchmarking System'' (BBS) by Scalable Informatics LLC:
    http://bioinformatics.org/bbs/

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Message
    Working on 2.0
    Submitted by Joe Landman; posted on Monday, June 21, 2004
    Folks: Work is actively progressing on 2.0 (2.4 really). Big changes (good ones) to the run model, the test specification model, and related. Should be out soon. Joe



    Post a followup to this message:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.
    Thread view
    Working on 2.0
    Submitted by Joe Landman; posted on Monday, June 21, 2004
    Folks: Work is actively progressing on 2.0 (2.4 really). Big changes (good ones) to the run model, the test specification model, and related. Should be out soon. Joe

     

    Copyright © 2024 Scilico, LLC · Privacy Policy