Bioinformatics.org
[University of Birmingham]
[Patsnap]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (44459+) Group hosting [?] Wiki
    Franklin Award
    Sponsorships

    Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • News & Commentary - Message forums

    Research: JAMA Network: What happens when underperforming big ideas in research become entrenched?
    Submitted by Prashanth N Suravajhala; posted on Wednesday, October 05, 2016

    Submitter

    EXCERPT

    In this Viewpoint, John Ioannidis and colleagues review how rarely gene therapy and genomic medicine have led to breakthroughs for patients and call on the NIH to defund preclinical research that fails to deliver on its initial promise.

    For several decades now the biomedical research community has pursued a narrative positing that a combination of ever-deeper knowledge of subcellular biology, especially genetics, coupled with information technology will lead to transformative improvements in health care and human health. In this Viewpoint, we provide evidence for the extraordinary dominance of this narrative in biomedical funding and journal publications; discuss several prominent themes embedded in the narrative to show that this approach has largely failed; and propose a wholesale reevaluation of the way forward in biomedical research.
    Source: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2541515

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Start a new thread:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.

     

    Copyright © 2024 Scilico, LLC · Privacy Policy